Health insurance for digital nomads

Every safety net on this site attaches to residence — and your life is built on not having one. That is workable. It is even elegant. But it means your policy is the entire system, and it deserves to be chosen like one.

Book a consultation

Free · 45 minutes · With Robert or Nicole

Not ready to book? Read how this works

Written by Robert Kolar, health insurance

Facts last checked 2026-08-01

The nomad problem, stated once

Three facts your itinerary does not change.

The countries change weekly. The structure underneath does not, and the structure is where nomad insurance goes right or wrong.

Travel insurance is the wrong product held sideways

Travel policies are built around a home system you will return to: they stabilise you and send you back to it. A nomad has no "back". Long-stay lives need health insurance that treats where you are as where you live — the two products share a counter at the airport and almost nothing else.

Your base decides more than your itinerary

Insurers price and pay against your declared country of residence, not your flight history. Which country you can honestly declare — and what that does to premiums, networks and claim admissibility — is the structural decision of the nomad setup. It is worth more thought than the destination list gets.

And some borders quietly change the rules

Stay long enough in the wrong place and you stop being a visitor: Japan compels residents over three months into its national scheme, Thailand's visas carry insurance floors, Schengen entries want proof of cover. The nomad plan has to survive the countries that notice you as well as the ones that never do.

None of this argues for the most expensive policy. It argues for the deliberately chosen one — which is frequently cheaper than the accidental stack of travel products it replaces.

Why this is a consultation, not an article

The answer depends on which nomad you are.

There are at least four different people inside the word "nomad", and they need four different setups. The one with a kept registration in Switzerland or Germany has a home system to anchor to and must decide what is worth keeping. The fully deregistered one has no anchor and needs the policy to be the whole structure — a different product, differently priced.

The one drifting toward a base — three winters in the same Lisbon flat — is quietly becoming a resident, with obligations (and rights) accruing whether or not they notice. And the one nomading with a family multiplies every question by each member, because children need paediatric networks, schools ask for proof of cover, and a partner’s insurability is its own file.

An article cannot tell you which of the four you are this year — and the setups are different enough that guessing wrong costs real money in one direction and real exposure in the other. Forty-five minutes with your actual passports, registrations and route settles it. That is the consultation, and it is free.

What the popular bases actually cost

The classic nomad bases are not the cheap ones.

Mexico ranks eighth of fifty for comparable international cover. Thailand ranks ninth. The two destinations that anchor more nomad itineraries than anywhere else are, on this measure, among the ten most expensive countries in the world — above Switzerland, above Spain, above Germany.

That reads as a mistake until you look at what the premium is buying. In Bangkok, Chiang Mai or Mexico City the hospitals an international policy sends you to are private, international-standard and priced for a market that includes medical tourism. Cheap rent and cheap lunch have no bearing on it. Vietnam, forty-second, and Malaysia, thirty-third, cost between a quarter and a third less than Thailand on the same kind of paper.

None of which decides where you should live. It does mean the insurance line in a cost-of-living spreadsheet is usually the one that has been guessed rather than checked — and, for anyone still carrying travel insurance and calling it health cover, guessed on the wrong product entirely.

Six countries that come up in almost every nomad conversation, from an independent fifty-country benchmark. Ranks are out of fifty, most expensive first.
Rank	Country	At 24	At 35	At 50	Average
8	Mexico	$6,967	$9,830	$13,257	$10,018
9	Thailand	$6,895	$9,621	$13,047	$9,854
23	Indonesia	$5,604	$7,932	$10,291	$7,942
33	Malaysia	$5,146	$7,242	$9,612	$7,333
27	Portugal	$5,485	$7,686	$10,184	$7,785
42	Vietnam	$4,776	$6,763	$8,945	$6,828

Source: SIP Health Cost Index 2025, SIP Medical Family Office. Data as at August 2025, published 1 December 2025. Averages across seven international insurers and three standard profiles — not quotes, and not a comparison of those insurers against each other. Any comparison or tax-adjusted figure above is our own arithmetic on SIP's published numbers.

All fifty countries, and the three things the ranking hides

For nomads specifically

Three ways this goes wrong on the road.

Renewing the annual travel policy for the fifth year

The most common nomad setup we review is a backpacker product carried years past the backpacking. The tell is in the wording: repatriation "home", trip-length limits, exclusions for the routine care a resident actually uses. It worked because nothing went wrong yet — which is not what insurance is for.

Declaring a residence you no longer hold

A policy anchored to an address you left is a policy an insurer can question at claim time — and claim time is the worst possible moment for a residency conversation. The declaration has to match the life, or the paper is cheaper than it looks in the worst way.

Buying the itinerary instead of the exposure

Nomads compare policies by country lists. The expensive differences are elsewhere: whether cover continues if you settle, whether the USA is inside the area of cover for the conference month, what the evacuation clause does in the thin-hospital places, and what happens at 45 to a policy bought at 30.

Any of these sound like your situation? See how a review works

How a review works

What a first review actually looks like.

Arranging international cover for the first time, or checking what you already hold — the process is the same, in this order.

The demand intake

Right after you book, we email you a short intake form. Where you are, where you're going, who's coming with you, anything you already hold. It takes a few minutes, and it means the 45 minutes start prepared — with your situation, not with paperwork.

We study your situation

Not products first. Your life first. We look at the country you're moving to and what it legally requires, the country after that if there is one, who depends on you, and where the real exposure sits. We don't quote anything at this stage.

The consultation

45 minutes, by video, in English. Every question you bring gets an answer. We compare the international insurers on how each of them behaves in your situation — underwriting, renewal, exclusions, and what happens on the day a claim is filed. If there is already a policy in force, we go through it clause by clause. Nothing is pitched at the end of it.

Your Private Client Report

One working day later, your Private Client Report arrives — around twelve pages setting out what we found, what we weighed it against, what each option costs, and why we would choose one over the others. What to arrange, what to keep, and where you are paying for something that isn't doing any work. Sometimes the report says: keep what you have. It is yours either way.

45 minutes. By video, wherever you are. Free. Nothing has to change afterwards.

Book a review

The Cleveland Clinic charges $1,690 for a written second opinion. Ours comes with the review, and there is no fee for it.

The team

The people who'll actually review your situation.

Specialists by topic, not a rota. You'll know who you're speaking to before you book, and you'll speak to the same person again next year.

Robert Kolar

Health insurance

Twenty-plus years spent on the distance between what a health policy promises and what it pays when a claim actually lands. German and English. He has been the foreigner working out somebody else's health system from the outside, which is its own kind of qualification.

Book with Robert

Nicole Bohne

Life · Protection · Planning

Spent her career inside Basler Versicherung and Zurich Insurance before crossing to this side of the table. Nicole reads a life-cover decision against the whole household — who depends on whom, what already exists, and whether the answer is a policy at all.

Book with Nicole

Hans Steiner

Pension · Tax · Cross-border

Financial Planner IAF, Federal Diploma of Higher Education. German, English and French. Hans takes the cases where a move collides with a pension, with two tax systems, or with both at once.

Book with Hans

Nomad questions

What travelling people actually ask us.

Is travel insurance enough for a digital nomad?

For trips, yes; for a life, no. Travel policies assume a home system to return to — they stabilise and repatriate, cap trip lengths, and exclude the routine and preventive care a resident actually uses. A nomad needs international health insurance: cover that treats where you are as where you live, renews on its own terms rather than per trip, and does not define "home" as somewhere you no longer are.

What country do I insure myself in if I keep moving?

The structural question of the whole setup. International insurers anchor a policy to a declared country of residence — it drives pricing, network and admissibility — and the honest answer differs by person: some nomads keep a real registration somewhere, some hold none at all, and the two situations need different products. This is exactly what we untangle in a consultation, because the wrong anchor is the most expensive quiet mistake in nomad insurance.

Do visa rules apply to me as a nomad?

Increasingly, yes. Nomad and long-stay visas commonly carry insurance requirements with named floors, Schengen entries can ask for proof of cover, and staying past thresholds converts you into a resident with obligations — Japan compels residents beyond three months into National Health Insurance, verified against the official guides. The nomad plan has to clear the countries that check, not just the ones that do not.

What should a nomad policy actually contain?

Read for structure, not country count: worldwide area of cover with the USA question answered deliberately; no trip-length limits; evacuation with a clear decision mechanism for the thin-hospital places; guaranteed renewability so the policy survives your forties; and a realistic path if you settle somewhere — because most nomads eventually do, and the policy that ends at settlement was a trip policy wearing a better brochure.

I have been fine without insurance for three years. Why start now?

Because the arithmetic runs backwards from how it feels. Every healthy year makes cover feel less necessary and makes entering it cheaper than it will ever be again — underwriting prices your age and history at entry, and one diagnosis moves you from "insurable at standard terms" to "excluded where it matters". The three lucky years are not evidence; they are the window.

From the journal

Reading on this situation.

facts checked 2026-08-10